AI CONFLICT INTELLIGENCE

See the truth behind any argument.

ArgueMap analyzes arguments from every angle—what each person really said, what they meant, who was fair, where the breakdown happened, and how to move forward.

Analyze an ArgumentSee Example
Private & SecureEvidence-BasedNo Human Involved
Argument Map
ShareExport⋯
MapFlowJurisdictionFairnessClaimsEvidenceImpactRepairSummary
Core Conflict
What's really at the heart of this argument?
Person A
Wants real effort, consideration, and investigation
Love requires effort & curiosity
Repeated refusal hurts
Boundaries are valid
Person B
Wants lower expectations and less suffering
Humans have limits
Acceptance reduces suffering
Not everything needs discussing
Points of Disagreement
Standards vs. Acceptance  •  Effort vs. Lower Expectations
A's PositionB's PositionShared / OverlapBreakdown Point
How it works

Three steps to clarity

No therapist needed. No awkward conversations about having the conversation. Just honest input — mapped objectively.

STEP 01

You share your side

Describe what happened, what was said, and what you actually felt. No filtering required — the AI has seen it all.

STEP 02

The other person adds theirs

Hand the screen over or send a private link. They write their account — completely blind to what you wrote.

STEP 03

Claude maps the argument

Both sides are analyzed together — claims verified, emotions surfaced, misunderstandings named, and a repair path laid out.

Built for clarity.
Not for conflict.
100% Private
Your data is never stored or shared
Neutral & Unbiased
AI analysis with no sides taken
Multiple Perspectives
Compare all sides at once
Clear & Visual
Complex arguments made simple
DEEP. NEUTRAL. ACTIONABLE.

Every angle. Every time.

ArgueMap gives you the most complete analysis of any argument.

Visual Argument Map

See how every statement connects. Understand the structure instantly.

Learn more
Jurisdiction Check

Were both people arguing in the same jurisdiction? We find out.

Learn more
Fairness / Consideration

Was each person being fair? We score burden, effort, care, and consideration.

Learn more
Claim-by-Claim Verdict

Every major claim is scored: Won, Lost, Shared, Unresolved, or Needs Evidence.

Learn more
Evidence & Quotes

We pull the strongest quotes and attach them to each claim.

Learn more
Emotional Consequence

Understand the emotional impact of every stance and action.

Learn more
Misunderstanding Detector

We find where each person responded to a distorted version of the other.

Learn more
Repair Path

Get tailored repair steps for both sides to rebuild coherence.

Learn more
Capacity Analysis

See each person's strengths, limits, biases, and likely motivations.

Learn more
Concession Map

Track what each person conceded—explicitly or implicitly.

Learn more
Hidden Premise Finder

We uncover the assumptions underneath every argument.

Learn more
Relational Outcome

What happened to the relationship? Bond, trust, closeness, or distance?

Learn more
AI Feedback Analyzer

How did each person respond to the analysis? Tone, trust, and reception.

Learn more
POWERFUL REPORTS

See what matters.
Make what's next clearer.

View Example Report
Fairness / Consideration
Person A
74
/100
Person B
41
/100
Burden Sharing
Effort & Willingness
Care & Consideration
Emotional Impact
Repair Capacity
Claim-by-Claim Verdict
MAJOR CLAIMVERDICT
Love requires effort…Won by A
Lower expectations reduce…Won by B
Repeated refusal causes hurtWon by A
Humans have limitsShared
Boundaries are validShared
Not everything needs…Won by B
AI is not a final judgeUnresolved
View All Claims
Emotional Consequence
19
Total Impacts
High Impact
9
Low Impact
Awareness
9
View Full Breakdown
Repair Path
For Person A
1. Acknowledge the other's limits
2. Express needs without urgency
3. Ask for specific kinds of effort
For Person B
1. Acknowledge the impact of refusal
2. Show curiosity in small ways
3. Reassure care while setting limits
View Full Plan
TRUSTED BY PEOPLE WHO VALUE CLARITY
Families
Couples
Friends
Roommates
Co-Founders
Anyone in Conflict
“It's like seeing the whole argument from above for the first time.”
4.9/5 from early users